top of page

2020 COVID lessons……………but, can we learn.

 

COVID-19 has raised more questions for us as a species, than it has answered

As COVID-19 is a worldwide problem, it has enormous travel implications at the global macro level. This is an opinion piece looking at Ireland as a barometer of that macro world experience distilled down to the micro level facing planners and communities. These solutions and their implementation will have a very tangible impact on the global travel experience, in the future.

 

COVID-19 Has changed much about our lives. It has changed how we work, how we socialise, even, at times, where we can go. Suburbs (where people live) bustle, but city centres and high streets (where people work and shop) stumble along. 

 

Fewer cars and cleaner air mean roads and streets are safer for strolling. It’s been striking to see so many out for walks, cycles or just fresh air this year. The pandemic and its restrictions have emphasised the importance of your local community’s amenities and facilities. What can be accessed within 5km is a life-changer. 

 

As we (hopefully) emerge from the worst effects of the pandemic, on the back of positive news of vaccine developments, it’s most unlikely and probably undesirable that we’ll just revert to the way things were. Lessons need to be learned.

 

But we faced an existential challenge long before Covid – climate change – and once the wretched disease is under control, climate action will continue to drive a need to change Ireland’s traditional focus on building our cities, towns and villages outwards.

An oft-heard and knee-jerk reaction is this: let’s spread people out more, build even more of our housing in the countryside, sure can’t we all e-work?

 

But where will that bring us? Remote working does offer new ways to reduce lengthy and unproductive commutes. E-working hubs are a game-changer in reviving rural towns and villages. But meeting most of our future housing demand in the countryside? Seriously? That would be a hugely energy-intensive way of living, with people more disconnected from the communities.

Instead, others champion smarter ways. Dublin Chamber has promoted its 15 minute City concept and the Southern Regional Assembly its 10 Minute Town Framework and Methodology.

 

These initiatives are about a more imaginative mixed-use approach to the planning of our cities and towns where everything you need is no more than 10 or 15 minutes away and you feel a part of a community, not just a commuter.

 

And that brings us to the big planning question on the response to places permanently affected if not all the office workers return to city and town centres and the shift to online retail continues. What should fill our city and town centres of the future?

 

Regional shifts

Last year, according to CSO statistics, Naas in County Kildare, saw about the same number of new homes built as in all of Dublin 1-8 combined. Most of our regional cities are likewise – greenfield trumps brownfield every time.

Isn’t that a wake-up call to authorities, communities and property owners to rethink what we prioritise in our city and town centres? As the National Planning Framework highlights, vibrant cities and towns will come about through publicly directed housing rather than sole reliance on market forces.

The physical layout of our homes also needs some fresh thinking. The point has been well-made in recent months that, for many, our homes are working harder than ever before. Part office, lecture hall, classroom and necessary provider of both personal yet flexible spaces. 

 

 

And living and working in a home over a longer period brings energy efficiency into sharper focus. With heater settings in older homes pressed into 24-hour service, how many are thinking hard about retro-fitting. Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAi) grant schemes will be busy!

 

The basic point is that there were many trends present pre-Covid that our response to the pandemic must learn from and act on.

 

For the Office of the Planning Regulator, our independent assessments of local authority development plans, dozens of which are due for review in the next 12-18 months, our research and planning authority reviews programs, all reachable at www.opr.ie, are going to be the real litmus test in whether we have learned from the pandemic and reconnected to those old, but still true planning objectives.

 

COVID-19 has reconnected us to the importance of the quality of our local places –urban or rural. Rooted in our localities, we are now noticing more – sometimes wanting better in terms of the way we move about, access to amenities and facilities we now know we really need.

 

Emboldened by the need to act to save the vitality of de-workered city and town centres, many new initiatives have sprung up. Should these stay? Will they be enough?

 

Yes and no. Pre-covid, progressive local authorities were already working to provide better public infrastructure but the pandemic has stepped this up. Footpaths widened. New cycle routes. Extended outdoor eating areas. Urban mini-parks – all have sprung up to stir city and town centres on life-support.

 

Public parks and amenities, play areas, canal towpaths have witnessed a marked growth in usage throughout Covid. We appreciate more than ever how our green spaces allow us to reconnect with nature and there are lessons there for future planning.

 

Community, not commuter hubs

Our local authorities have made a huge effort in dealing with the pandemic. Those that continue to facilitate more active travel alternatives and put green thinking at the heart of their planning will be the ones that create much more resilient and adaptable communities for their citizens. These communities will be the ones to rebound quickest.

 

Covid has also prompted commentary around our approach to housing. An exodus from cities to rural e-working alternatives is seen by some as the answer.

 

The answer? City and town centres that cater to the people that live there, work there and enjoy all the amenities and cultural vitality.

Good planning is going to be the difference in adapting cities and towns, facilitating residential development that is affordable to replace the almost total reliance on office and retail which may no longer be in such demand.

 

 

Only time will tell, if our 2020 COVID-19 experience is going to be a real litmus test in whether we have learned from the pandemic and reconnection with the need for community. History in Ireland has shown us that the more we change, the more we stay the same. A 1969 strategic review in Ireland around this very issue, despite the best intentions in the world, it was a worth while exercise. But it still remains just that, an exercise.

Irish case study from the 1960’s

 

 

European Regional Development Perspective (ESDP) 1999 

  • Regional cities to act as drivers of development in their regions 

  • • Move from being subordinate regional service centres to independent participants in international economy 

  • • Need to develop specialised export bases 

  • • Need to complementary relationship between regional cities and rural hinterlands 

  • • Regional cities to become gateways through which the regions’ links with the outside world are channelled 

  • • Ultimate objective: Achieve balanced regional development through maximising each region’s potential

 

​

The Irish Government 1960’s action on strategic regional development

 

The Buchanan spatial plan (1969)

Buchanan Report Remit 

  • Undertake an analysis of the resource base and economic development potential of each of the nine planning regions; 

  • • Propose a spatial development policy to guide future growth in the regions; 

  • • Set out the infrastructural requirements arising from the proposed regional policy.

 

 

Buchanan Report Background 

Disquiet with dispersal policy for incoming foreign plants: 

  • Strong preference for urban locations in industrialised countries 

  • • Superior service and infrastructural base of urban centres a major attraction for investors 

  • • Concentrated investment in public services and infrastructure a more efficient use of scarce public resources 

  • • Fewer incentives required to attract firms to urban locations 

  • • Stimulatory impacts on rural hinterlands of strong urban growth

 

​

The Buchanan spatial plan

Buchanan Report Remit 

  • Undertake an analysis of the resource base and economic development potential of each of the nine planning regions; 

  • • Propose a spatial development policy to guide future growth in the regions; 

  • • Set out the infrastructural requirements arising from the proposed regional policy.

 

 

Buchanan Report: Key elements 

  • Dublin to grow “naturally”: no incentives or restrictions 

  • • Main development effort to focus on raising Cork and Limerick/Shannon to a scale capable of competing with Dublin 

  • • Six regional growth centres – Waterford, Dundalk, Drogheda established industrial centres – Galway, Sligo, Athlone to be developed as regional service and industrial centres 

  • • Four local growth centres in peripheral regions to be developed as service centres – Letterkenny, Cavan, Castlebar, Tralee

 

Government response to report

From the government policy statement accompanying the publication of the Buchanan Report (May 1969) “While the government accepts, in principle, that growth centres can be a valuable element in a regional programme…” “A growth centre programme on the lines recommended by the consultants would have far-reaching implications…for development prospects in other areas…” “It has been decided, therefore, that the consultant’s growth-centre recommendations should be further considered in the context for regional development generally.”

 

 

The National Spatial Strategy (NSS) Key weaknesses 

  • Absence of blueprint for the creation of gateway focused specialised regional enterprise structures 

  • • Absence of necessary governance structures – Decentralisation of functions/powers – Creation of strong regional governance structures 

  • • Failure to address opposition from national state apparatus (central bureaucracy and political system)

Acknowledge reference:- Niall Cussen OPR (DHPLG)

  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Archie.Donovan
  • JustRetired50Plus
  • Pinterest
  • YouTube

© 2023 by NOMAD ON THE ROAD. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page